Translate

Monday, July 18, 2011

A Thousand Pictures Is Worth One Word.


In spite of constant headlines about debts and deficits, most Americans don’t really believe the U.S. dollar will collapse. From knowledgeable investors who study the markets to those seemingly too busy to worry about such things, most dismiss the idea of the dollar actually going to zero.
History has a message for us: No fiat currency has lasted forever. Eventually, they all fail.
BMG BullionBars recently published a poster featuring pictures of numerous currencies that have gone bust. Some got there quickly, while others took a century or more. Regardless of how long it took, though, the seductive temptations allowed under a fiat monetary system eventually caught up with these governments, and their currencies went poof!
You might suspect this happened only to third world countries. You’d be wrong. There was no discrimination as to the size or perceived stability of a nation’s economy; if the leaders abused their currency, the country paid the price.
As you scroll through the currencies below, you’ll see some long-ago casualties. What’s shocking, though, is how many have occurred in our lifetime. You might count how many currencies have failed since you’ve been born.
So what’s the one word for the “thousand pictures” below? Worthless.
Yugoslavia – 10 billion dinar, 1993
Zaire – 5 million zaires, 1992
Venezuela – 10,000 bolívares, 2002
Ukraine – 10,000 karbovantsiv, 1995
Turkey – 5 million lira, 1997
Russia – 10,000 rubles, 1992
Romania – 50,000 lei, 2001
Central Bank of China – 10,000 CGU, 1947
Peru – 100,000 intis, 1989
Nicaragua – 10 million córdobas, 1990
Hungary – 10 million pengo, 1945
Greece – 25,000 drachmas, 1943
Germany – 1 billion mark, 1923
Georgia – 1 million laris, 1994
France – 5 livres, 1793
Chile – 10,000 pesos, 1975
Brazil – 500 cruzeiros reais, 1993
Bosnia – 100 million dinar, 1993
Bolivia – 5 million pesos bolivianos, 1985
Belarus – 100,000 rubles, 1996
Argentina – 10,000 pesos argentinos, 1985
Angola – 500,000 kwanzas reajustados, 1995
Zimbabwe – 100 trillion dollars, 2006
So, will a similar fate befall the U.S. dollar? The common denominator that led to the downfall of each currency above was the two big Ds: Debts and Deficits.
With that in mind, consider the following:
Morgan Stanley reported in 2009 that there’s “no historical precedent” for an economy that exceeds a 250% debt-to-GDP ratio without experiencing some sort of financial crisis or high inflation. Our total debt now exceeds GDP by roughly 400%.
Investment legend Marc Faber reports that once a country’s payments on debt exceed 30% of tax revenue, the currency is “done for.” On our current path, analyst Michael Murphy projects we’ll hit that figure by October.
Peter Bernholz, the leading expert on hyperinflation, states unequivocally that “hyperinflation is caused by government budget deficits.” This year’s U.S. budget deficit will end up being $1.5 trillion, an amount never before seen in history.
Since the Federal Reserve’s creation in 1913, the dollar has lost 95% of its purchasing power. Our government leaders clearly don’t know how – or don’t wish – to keep the currency strong.
Whether the dollar goes to zero or merely becomes a second-class currency in the global arena, the possibility of the greenback being added to the above list grows every day. And this will lead to serious and painful consequences in our standard of living. While money is only one of many problems we’ll have to deal with, you can protect your assets with the one currency that can’t be debased, devalued, or destroyed by irresponsible leaders.
Don’t be the investor who dismisses this message from history. Use gold (and silver) as your savings vehicle. Any excuse you have now will be meaningless and irrelevant when we enter that fateful period. Make sure you own enough precious metals to make a difference in your portfolio.
Because when it comes to money, worthless is not a fun word.

These 90 Analysts Believe Gold Will Go to $5,000/ozt

f the 133 analysts who have now gone public in maintaining that gold will eventually go to a parabolic peak price of $2,500/ozt.+ before the bubble bursts, 90 – yes 90, maintain that gold will reach at least $5,000 per ozt. Take a look here at who is projecting what, by when.
Editor’s Note:
1. If you find a name missing from the list below send it to me (editor-at-munKNEE-dot-comwith the URL of the article in which the individual states his/her case so keep the list the most comprehensive on the internet. Only projections of at least $2,500 per troy ounce, accompanied by sound reasons, will be included in the revised list.
2For a hyperlink to the actual article in which the individuals state their parabolic peak price projections and rationale go here.
3 Analysts See Gold Reaching its Parabolic Peak Sometime in 2011!
  1. Bob Kirtley: $10,000;
  2. Patrick Kerr: $5,000 – $10,000;
  3. Taran Marwah: $3,000;
10 Analysts See Gold Reaching its Peak By the End of 2012
  1. Arnold Bock: $10,000;
  2. Porter Stansberry: $10,000;
  3. Taran Marwah: $6,000+;
  4. Greg McCoach: $5,000+;
  5. Robert McEwen: $5,000;
  6. Mary Anne and Pamela Aden: $3,000 – $5,000;
  7. John Paulson: $2,400 – $4,000;
  8. Ian McAvity: $2,500 – $3,000;
  9. Peter Hambro: $2,500;
  10. Charles Nenner: $2,500
These 11 Analysts See Gold Going Parabolic to +$10,000
  1. DoctoRX: $20,000 (by 2020);
  2. Mike Maloney: $15,000;
  3. Ben Davies: $10,000 – $15,000;
  4. Howard Katz: $14,000;
  5. Jeffrey Lewis: $7,000 – $14,000;
  6. Jim Sinclair: $12,455;
  7. Goldrunner: $10,000 – $12,000;
  8. Martin Armstrong: $5,000 – $12,000 (by 2015/16);
  9. Robin Griffiths: $3,000 – $12,000 (by 2015);
  10. Jim Rickards: $4,000 – $11,000;
  11. Roland Watson: $10,800;
These 46 Analysts See Gold Price Peaking Between $5,001 and $10,000
  1. Bob Kirtley: $10,000 (by 2011);
  2. Arnold Bock: $10,000 (by 2012);
  3. Porter Stansberry: $10,000 (by 2012);
  4. Peter George: $10,000 (by 2015);
  5. Tom Fischer: $10,000;
  6. Shayne McGuire: $10,000;
  7. Eric Hommelberg: $10,000;
  8. David Petch: $6,000 – $10,000;
  9. Gerald Celente: $6,000 – $10,000;
  10. Egon von Greyerz: $6,000 – $10,000;
  11. Peter Schiff: $5,000 – $10,000 (in 5 to 10 years);
  12. Patrick Kerr: $5,000 – $10,000 (by 2011);
  13. Peter Millar: $5,000 – $10,000;
  14. Roger Wiegand: $5,000 – $10,000;
  15. Alf Field: $4,250 – $10,000;
  16. Jeff Nielson: $3,000 – $10,000;
  17. Dennis van Ek: $9,000 (by 2015);
  18. Dominic Frisby: $8,000;
  19. Paul Brodsky: $8,000;
  20. James Turk: $8,000 (by 2015);
  21. Joseph Russo: $7,000 – $8,000;
  22. Bob Chapman: $7,700;
  23. Michael Rozeff: $2,865 – $7,151;
  24. Jim Willie: $7,000;
  25. Greg McCoach: $6,500;
  26. Dylan Grice: $6,300;
  27. Chris Mack: $6,241.64 (by 2015);
  28. Chuck DiFalco: $6,214 (by 2018);
  29. Jeff Clark: $6,214;
  30. Aubie Baltin: $6,200 (by 2017);
  31. Murray Sabrin: $6,153;
  32. Adam Hamilton: $6,000+;
  33. Samuel “Bud” Kress: $6,000 (by 2014);
  34. Robert Kientz: $6,000;
  35. Harry Schultz: $6,000;
  36. John Bougearel: $6,000;
  37. David Tice: $5,000 – $6,000;
  38. Laurence Hunt: $5,000 – $6,000 (by 2019);
  39. Taran Marwah: $3,000 – $6,000+ (by Dec. 2011 and Dec.2012, respectively);
  40. Martin Hutchinson: $3,100 – $5,700;
  41. Stephen Leeb: $5,500 (by 2015);
  42. Louise Yamada: $5,200;
  43. Jeremy Charlesworth: $5,000+;
  44. Przemyslaw Radomski: $5,000+;
  45. Jason Hamlin: $5,000+;
  46. David McAlvany: $5,000+
Cumulative sub-total: 57
(For a hyperlink to the article in which the individuals state their parabolic peak price projections and rationale go here.)
These 33 Analysts Believe Gold Price Could Go As High As $5,000
  1. David Rosenberg: $5,000;
  2. James West: $5,000;
  3. Doug Casey: $5,000;
  4. Peter Cooper: $5,000;
  5. Robert McEwen: $5,000 (by 2012 – 2014);
  6. Peter Krauth: $5,000;
  7. Tim Iacono: $5,000 (by 2017);
  8. Christopher Wyke: $5,000;
  9. Frank Barbera: $5,000;
  10. John Lee: $5,000;
  11. Barry Dawes: $5,000;
  12. Bob Lenzer: $5,000 (by 2015);
  13. Steve Betts: $5,000;
  14. Stewart Thomson: $5,000;
  15. Charles Morris: $5,000 (by 2015);
  16. Marvin Clark: $5,000 (by 2015);
  17. Eric Sprott: $5,000;
  18. Nathan Narusis: $5,000;
  19. Bud Conrad: $4,000 – $5,000;
  20. Paul Mylchreest: $4,000 – $5,000;
  21. Pierre Lassonde: $4,000 – $5,000;
  22. Willem Middelkoop: $4,000 – $5,000;
  23. Mary Anne and Pamela Aden: $3,000 – $5,000 (by February 2012);
  24. James Dines: $3,000 – $5,000;
  25. Bill Murphy: $3,000 – $5,000;
  26. Bill Bonner: $3,000 – $5,000;
  27. Peter Degraaf: $2,500 – $5,000;
  28. Eric Janszen: $2,500 – $5,000;
  29. Larry Jeddeloh: $2,300 – $5,000 (by 2013);
  30. Larry Edelson: $2,300 – $5,000 (by 2015);
  31. Luke Burgess: $2,000 – $5,000;
  32. Marc Faber: $1,500 – $5,000;
  33. Robert Lloyd-George: $5,000 (by 2014)
Cumulative sub-total: 90
(For a hyperlink to the article in which the individuals state their parabolic peak price projections and rationale go here.)
31 Analysts Believe Gold Will Go Up to Between $3,000 and $4,999
1. David Moenning: $4,525;
2. Larry Reaugh: $4,000+;
3. Ernest Kepper: $4,000;
4. Mike Knowles: $4,000;
5. Ian Gordon/Christopher Funston: $4,000;
6. Barry Elias: $4,000; (by 2020);
7. Jay Taylor: $3,000 – $4,000;
8. Christian Barnard: $2,500 – $4,000;
9. John Paulson: $2,400 – $4,000 (by 2012);
10. Paul Tustain: $3,844;
11. Myles Zyblock: $3,800;
12. Eric Roseman: $2,500 – $3,500 (by 2015);
13. Christopher Wood: $3,360;
14. Franklin Sanders: $3,130;
15. John Henderson: $3,000+ (by 2015 – 17);
16. Michael Berry: $3,000+ (by 2015);
17. Hans Goetti: $3,000;
18. Michael Yorba: $3,000;
19. David Urban; $3,000;
20. Mitchell Langbert: $3,000;
21. Brett Arends: $3,000;
22. Ambrose Evans-Pritchard: $3,000;
23. John Williams: $3,000;
24. Byron King: $3,000;
25. Ron Paul: $3,000 (by 2020);
26. Chris Weber: $3,000 (by 2020);
27. Mark Leibovit: $3,000;
28. Mark O’Byrne: $3,000;
29. Kevin Kerr: $3,000;
30. Frank Holmes: $3,000;
31. Shamik Bhose: $3,000 (by 2014)
Cumulative sub-total: 121
(For a hyperlink to the article in which the individuals state their parabolic peak price projections and rationale go here.)
These 12 Analysts Believe Gold Will Go to Between $2,500 and $3,000
  1. Ian McAvity: $2,500 – $3,000 (by 2012);
  2. Jeff Nichols: $2,000 – $3,000;
  3. Graham French: $2,000 – $3,000;
  4. Bank of America Merrill Lynch: $2,000 – $3,000;
  5. Joe Foster: $2,000 – $3,000 (by 2019);
  6. David Morgan: $2,900;
  7. Sascha Opel: $2,500+;
  8. Rick Rule: $2,500 (by 2013);
  9. Daniel Brebner: $2,500;
  10. James DiGeorgia: $2,500;
  11. Peter Hambro: $2,500 (by 2012);
  12. Charles Nenner: $2,500 (by 2012 – 13)
Grand Total: 133
ref:
By: Lorimer Wilson

Friday, June 10, 2011

Gold Seasonal Price Trends :27,000 Inr to 30,000 Inr in Short time ....))



Dear Friends, 
I got really interesting information if you are gold lover ... or metal investor...  cash is trash and gold and silver is money ( reach dad poor dad book). just find below information all the data in represent in US $. 
let me clear you something if you dot know about Troy Ounce 
Troy Ounce (ozt) is a unit of imperial measure. In the present day it is most commonly used to gauge the weight and therefore the price of precious metals. One troy ounce is equivalent to 31.1034768 grams. There are 32.1507466 troy oz in 1 kg. One troy ounce is equivalent to 1.09714 avoirdupois ounces. 
 so 1 Tola = 10 gm, SO  troy ounce is almost 3 tola of gold. (aprx)
as per the report gold will be treading 1800 to 2000 US $ in short time which will be almost 27000 to 30000 INR. 
enjoy the report and buy some GOLD ANS SILVER 
Gold had enjoyed five years of gains after bottoming in 2001, reaching a 26-year high of $730 that May, but was undergoing a significant correction that would ultimately erode 28% of its value in just over a month. It was the single largest loss of value the gold market had seen since its collapse in 1980
Many financial analysts were calling it the end of the bull market in gold. We at USAGOLD had a different theory, one that we published in the midst of that pullback entitled, “Bargain Buying: Take Advantage of the Summer Doldrums.”
In our analysis, we discovered that each and every year spanning 2001-2006, the gold market would show price weakness in the first two months of the summer. From there, prices moved decisively higher by year’s end, with the vast majority of the gains (better than two-thirds) for the full year (the lone exception, 2002) coming after the June/July swoon. This trend is clearly illustrated in the graphs to the right. On average, gold gained 11.8% over the last 5 months of those years, which annualized to an impressive 28.32% appreciation.
Needless to say, gold’s bull run did not end with that pullback in the summer of ’06. After bottoming in the $560 range, gold quickly rallied, and its meteoric rise since has caught the attention of even its most ardent critics:
Fast-forward to June 2011… 
Gold is slightly off after achieving an all-time high at $1572 per ounce this May and has begun to consolidate around the $1500 level. Many in the financial press are suggesting we have once again reached the end to the yellow metal’s bull market. They cite the recent price weakness along with hedge fund billionaire George Soros’ decision to liquidate the entirety of his position in the gold ETF as evidence that the market has reached a top. Yet none of the catalysts that contributed to gold’s rise over the past ten years have subsided. If anything, they have intensified.
To the point, another notable hedge fund billionaire, John Paulson, showed no hesitation in retaining the entirety of his position in GLD. In fact, his ownership stake still represents the largest single holding in the ETF. In justifying his decision to skeptics, Paulson stated in an April interview with the Wall St. Journal, “The United States and the United Kingdom have flooded their respective economies with money in order to fuel a more-robust economic recovery. That rush of money will apply inflationary pressures on those economies, making gold poised to the hit the $4,000 mark in a few years.”
As it was in 2006, the actionable trend typical of the summer doldrums has proven to be reliable and predictable, and is perhaps once again a more reasonable explanation of the recent, albeit limited, weakness in the gold price.
Bolstering the point, the last five years have seen nearly the exact same post-doldrums performance as the five years preceding them, with gains after June/July averaging 11.25%, or 27% annualized. Due to the onset of the financial crisis, 2008 represents the only year in the last ten where this trend did not hold true. Gold was not immune to the massive de-leveraging that took place in all asset classes, and took a significant hit in September and October of that year. Even though the price of gold recovered by year’s end, it was slightly more than 5% worse than the average price over the June/July period. Adding strength to the overall argument, however, the post-summer trend remained sufficiently strong in the other four years to achieve nearly the same aggregate average as the first five years of the bull market, despite the negative data in 2008.
Over the full period of this decade-long study, gold has averaged annual gains of 17.42%. The average gain after the June/July swoon has been 11.46%. In other words, on average, just better than 2/3 of all annual gains over the past ten years in gold have come in the last five months of the year.
The combination of the escalating sovereign debt crisis in Europe, the unknown future of the Fed’s quantitative easing program, the ongoing debt ceiling debate, the early warning signs of inflation, especially in food and commodities (as illustrated in our latest newsletter), and ongoing geopolitical instability promise to make the second half of 2011 very interesting for the gold market. Whether or not a meaningful pullback will manifest in the next two months is unknown, but the past ten years do make one thing abundantly clear: If you’re looking to add gold to your portfolio, taking advantage of the summer doldrums can be a reliable and rewarding strategy.



Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in commentary e do not constitute an offer to buy or sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any precious metals product, nor should they be viewed in any way as investment advice or advice to buy, sell or hold. Centennial Precious Metals, Inc. recommends the purchase of physical precious metals for asset preservation purposes, not speculation. Utilization of these opinions for speculative purposes is neither suggested nor advised. Commentary is strictly for educational purposes, and as such USAGOLD - Centennial Precious Metals does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of the information found here.

Ref :http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article28472
By Jonathan Kosares,USAGOLD - Centennial Precious Metals, Denver